Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrick Kypson vs Nathan Pasha Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kypson vs Pasha analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Kypson vs Nathan Pasha Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kypson 2 - 0 Pasha
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kypson has won 52.75% of points on their second serve, while Pasha has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kypson, in recent form, has won 48.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pasha has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.19% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kypson has saved 63.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pasha has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kypson has won 58.73% of matches played (W/L 37/ 26), with Pasha winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kypson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 32/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Pasha has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 36/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Kypson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.44% of matches (W/L 29/ 16), where as Pasha has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kypson winning 2 times and Pasha being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Kypson winning 4 and Pasha winning 2. The last match between Kypson and Pasha was at the USA F6, 01-02-2016, Q3, Clay with Patrick Kypson getting the victory 7-5 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kypson and Pasha have played a deciding set 2 times, with Kypson winning 2 times and Pasha 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kypson winning 0, and Pasha 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kypson has played against opponents with an average rank of 271.81 while Pasha has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kypson has won 23% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pasha has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kypson has converted 41.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pasha has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
140
Rank
133
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
507
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
63% (196-114)
Career Total W/L
52% (83-77)
50% (15-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$143,295
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Patrick Kypson vs Nathan Pasha For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kypson VS Pasha
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Patrick Kypson | Nathan Pasha |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:30 | 1:9:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (51/85) | 71% (72/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (31/51) | 53% (38/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (16/34) | 45% (13/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (50/101) | 45% (38/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| 4-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Patrick Kypson
Player
Nathan Pasha
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrick Kypson | Nathan Pasha |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (15/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (35/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (358/334) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 243 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.5 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1277/2094) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (966/1277) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (431/817) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (61/146) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (715/2077) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (14/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 39% (7/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 72% (18/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 28% (18/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Patrick Kypson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Patrick Kypson
71%
(
96 of
135)
1st Serve %
63%
(
84 of
133)
10
Aces
21
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
59 of
84)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
49 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
51 of
133)
137
Total Points Won
131
|
6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Patrick Kypson
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Patrick Kypson
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Patrick Kypson
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nathan Pasha Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
John Mcnally
Player
Nathan Pasha
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven Diez
Player
Nathan Pasha
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Nathan Pasha
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
14
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
5
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Krainik
Player
Nathan Pasha
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
104)
11
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Gomez
Player
Nathan Pasha
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
84)
15
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Nathan Pasha
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Pasha
Player
Francesco Ferrari
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
52 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Nathan Pasha
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kypson Vs Pasha Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kypson are available here and Pasha photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
